[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277349138.26161.144.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:12:18 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/5] sfc: Implement message level control
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 18:29 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:30:07 +0100
>
> > @@ -850,6 +866,8 @@ const struct ethtool_ops efx_ethtool_ops = {
> > .get_drvinfo = efx_ethtool_get_drvinfo,
> > .get_regs_len = efx_ethtool_get_regs_len,
> > .get_regs = efx_ethtool_get_regs,
> > + .get_msglevel = efx_ethtool_get_msglevel,
> > + .set_msglevel = efx_ethtool_set_msglevel,
> > .nway_reset = efx_ethtool_nway_reset,
> > .get_link = efx_ethtool_get_link,
> > .get_eeprom_len = efx_ethtool_get_eeprom_len,
>
> davem@...set:~/src/GIT/net-next-2.6$ egrep get_regs_len drivers/net/sfc/ethtool.c
> davem@...set:~/src/GIT/net-next-2.6$
>
> I don't know what tree you're patching this against, but neither net-2.6 nor
> net-next-2.6 have the context you have here in your patch so these patches
> do not apply at all.
I'm hoping you're going to apply
<http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/56308> first.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists