netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/5] sfc: Implement message level control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100624.143332.179939286.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/5] sfc: Implement message level control

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:12:18 +0100

> I'm hoping you're going to apply
> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/56308> first.

I'm hoping that you will always tell me about such dependencies
in the future.

I always work my queue out of order.  If I'm heavily backlogged like
I am now, I'll sometimes apply much "simpler" to review patch
sets before more difficult ones, even if the "difficult" ones are
older.

Never assume anything, always state explicitly what tree something
is for and whether dependencies exist for things as-yet not applied.

Your style of assuming things makes life real difficult for me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html