[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99737F4847ED0A48AECC9F4A1974A4B80F82CB7D4E@MNEXMB2.qlogic.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:09:18 -0500
From: Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] qlcnic: fail when try to setup unsupported
features
>> I plan to add return EOPNOTSUPP to ethtool_op_set_flags().
I don't know what it will buy you.
Why don't you submit separate patch for below hunk, after your EOPNOTSUPP in ethtool_op_set_flags get accepted.
BTW, thanks of this fix.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stanislaw Gruszka [mailto:sgruszka@...hat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Amit Salecha
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Amerigo Wang; Anirban Chakraborty
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] qlcnic: fail when try to setup unsupported features
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:36:04 -0500
Amit Salecha <amit.salecha@...gic.com> wrote:
> - ethtool_op_set_flags(netdev, data);
> -
> - hw_lro = (data & ETH_FLAG_LRO) ? QLCNIC_LRO_ENABLED : 0;
> + if (data & ETH_FLAG_LRO) {
> + hw_lro = QLCNIC_LRO_ENABLED;
> + netdev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
> + } else {
> + hw_lro = 0;
> + netdev->features &= ~NETIF_F_LRO;
> + }
>
> Above hunk is unnecessary.
Yes, I did not describe that change in the changelog. I want to
remove such usage of ethtool_op_set_flags() for my furher patches, where
I plan to add return EOPNOTSUPP to ethtool_op_set_flags().
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists