[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EA929A9653AAE14F841771FB1DE5A1365FF4705C9D@rrsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:37:25 -0600
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [REGRESSION] e1000e stopped working
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 18:09 -0700, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
>> On Monday, June 28, 2010 10:14 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:04 -0700, Allan, Bruce W wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 20:43 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 20:29 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 20:27 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just that,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It doesn't receive anything from my internet router during
>>>>>>>> DHCP.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82566DC
>>>>>>>> Gigabit Network Connection [8086:104b] (rev 02) Subsystem:
>>>>>>>> Intel Corporation Device [8086:0001] Control: I/O+ Mem+
>>>>>>>> BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping-
>>>>>>>> SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B-
>>>>>>>> ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
>>>>>>>> INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 47 Region 0:
>>>>>>>> Memory at 50300000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
>>>>>>>> Region 1: Memory at 50324000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
>>>>>>>> [size=4K] Region 2: I/O ports at 30e0 [size=32]
>>>>>>>> Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk-
>>>>>>>> DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
>>>>>>>> Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME- Capabilities:
>>>>>>>> [d0] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0
>>>>>>>> Enable+ Address: 00000000fee0100c Data: 41c9 Kernel driver
>>>>>>>> in use: e1000e Kernel modules: e1000e
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I use vanilla tree, commit
>>>>>>>> bf2937695fe2330bfd8933a2310e7bdd2581dc2e
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Maxim Levitsky
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It appears to work now after reboot.
>>>>>>> Will keep a look for this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Disregard for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just s2ram cycle, problem is back.
>>>>>> Did full reboot (power off then on), same thing card doesn't
>>>>>> work...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, s2ram sometimes 'fixes', sometimes breaks the card.
>>>>> Something got broken in device initialization path.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Maxim Levitsky
>>>>
>>>> What distro are you using? If RedHat, since you are using DHCP
>>>> will you please try putting a "LINKDELAY=10" in the
>>>> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX config file.
>>>>
>>> I use ubuntu 9.10
>>>
>>>> Is there anything in the system log that might help narrow down the
>>>> issue?
>>>
>>> Nothing, really nothing.
>>> It seems to detect link, dhcp client sends requests, but doesn't
>>> recieve a thing (even tried promisc mode - doesn't help)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Maxim Levitsky
>>
>> Since you say this is a regression, when did this last work for you
>> without this problem, i.e. which distro, which kernel?
>
> I always compile kernel, and last kernel I compiled here was vanilla
> 2.6.33-rc4.
> It works just fine.
>
> I mostly use my laptop, and therefore didn't update kernel on my
> desktop for long time.
>
> If I find some free time I try to bisect the problem.
Could you provide some additional info about your setup:
ethtool -e eth0
ethtool -d eth0
kernel config (if possible)
What is the model of your system/MB?
Thanks,
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists