[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C2A715E.4010301@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:19:10 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core: use htons for skb->protocol
On 06/29/2010 09:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>
> This is only noticed by people that are not doing everything correct in
> the first place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 2b3bf53..78ad37c 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1541,7 +1541,8 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> if (net_ratelimit())
> printk(KERN_CRIT "protocol %04x is "
> "buggy, dev %s\n",
> - skb2->protocol, dev->name);
> + htons(skb2->protocol),
Would ntohs() be more appropriate here? It looks like you are
converting from network order to host order for printing.
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists