[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100629091519.GA2555@dhcp-lab-161.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:15:20 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: fail when try to setup unsupported
features
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:45:57AM -0700, Shreyas Bhatewara wrote:
> > +vmxnet3_set_flags(struct net_device *netdev, u32 data)
> > +{
> > struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > u8 lro_requested = (data & ETH_FLAG_LRO) == 0 ? 0 : 1;
> > u8 lro_present = (netdev->features & NETIF_F_LRO) == 0 ? 0 : 1;
> >
> > + if (data & ~ETH_FLAG_LRO)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > if (lro_requested ^ lro_present) {
> > /* toggle the LRO feature*/
> > netdev->features ^= NETIF_F_LRO;
> > --
> > 1.5.5.6
>
>
> Does not make sense to me. Switching LRO on/off is supported from the driver, why should the function return -EOPNOTSUPP ?
We return EOPNOTSUPP only if someone will try to setup other features
than LRO, if data == ETH_FLAG_LRO we will turn LRO on, and turn it off
when data == 0.
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists