[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100630.135816.106800276.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipv4: sysctl to block responding on down
interface
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:55:35 -0700
>> The fact that the syctl knob, when enabled, can't even function properly
>> in this "multiple interfaces with same address" case is another reason I
>> have decided to not apply this.
>
> We already have sysctl knobs that exist to work around broken printer TCP,
> middleboxes and other broken stacks; my opinion this is just another one
> of those types of workarounds.
But that sysctl knob for the printer workaround doesn't break legitimate
configurations like this one does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists