netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C2BB7F1.6050009@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:32:33 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, bphilips@...ell.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline
 on newer core 2/Xeon Arch

On 06/30/2010 02:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:38:00 -0700
> 
>> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>>
>> x86 architectures can handle unaligned accesses in hardware, and it has
>> been shown that unaligned DMA accesses can be expensive on Nehalem
>> architectures.  As such we should overwrite NET_IP_ALIGN to resolve
>> this issue.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> 
> Can I get an x86'er ACK on this?  I can merge it in via net-next-2.6
> which is probably most convenient for people who want to see the
> networking performance effects of this change.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html