[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tyojzbjm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:28:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
bphilips@...ell.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> writes:
Sorry for the late comment.
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MCORE2
> +/*
> + * We handle most unaligned accesses in hardware. On the other hand
> + * unaligned DMA can be quite expensive on some Nehalem processors.
> + *
> + * Based on this we disable the IP header alignment in network drivers.
> + */
> +#define NET_IP_ALIGN 0
> +#endif
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_SYSTEM_H */
The ifdef should be imho dropped and the option be made unconditional
for all x86. I am not aware of any x86 core where unalignment is really
slow. This would increase the chance of it actually working on many
configurations which do not necessarily optimize for Core2.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists