netdev - Re: TCP not triggering a fast retransmit?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1277947433.4878.11.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:23:53 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	Ivan Novick <novickivan@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jmatthews@...enplum.com,
	Tim Heath <theath@...enplum.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: TCP not triggering a fast retransmit?

On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:27 -0700, Ivan Novick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Ben Hutchings
> <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 11:04 -0700, Ivan Novick wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Attached is a packet capture from my application that is running on
> >> RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4
> >>
> >> I am seeing a Retransmission timeout but I was hoping this case would
> >> go into fast retransmit and not RTO.
> >>
> >> I am wondering why did the sender not send more data?  If the sender
> >> was to send more data and extend the window then it would seem the
> >> duplicate acks or SACKS should trigger fast retransmit.
> > [...]
> >
> > In that packet capture I see TCP payload lengths which are 2, 3 and 4
> > times the usual MSS of 1448 bytes, which implies that GRO or LRO is in
> > use.  In RHEL 5.4 the TCP stack does not ACK often enough in this case
> > because it is missing this change:
> >
> > commit ff9b5e0f08cb650d113eef0c654f931c0a7ae730
> > Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > Date:   Thu Aug 31 15:11:02 2006 -0700
> >
> >    [TCP]: Fix rcv mss estimate for LRO
> 
> Wow, Thanks! Is this the patch you are talking about:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg21151.html  ?
> 
> It looks like a one liner.   I could apply it and rebuild my RHEL 5.4
> to see if it helps.

Right, that's the same patch.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html