[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimTcqANb3HQuC1W6VHWTh0ixO1lXAmVrmP6OZy2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:12:29 -0300
From: Christophe Ngo Van Duc <cngovanduc@...il.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2/5709: Strange interrupts spread
Hi
Well that's the strange thing: it is IP traffic. The only difference
with eth0 and eth1 is that eth2 and eth3 belongs to a bridge (br0).
Best Regards,
Christophe.
On 7/2/10, Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:33 -0700, Christophe Ngo Van Duc wrote:
>> On eth2 (external card) all interrupts goes to CPU0
>>
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5
>> CPU6 CPU7
>> 80: 46973077 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-0
>> 81: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-1
>> 82: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-2
>> 83: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-3
>> 84: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-4
>> 85: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-5
>> 86: 0 0 2445 0 37 0
>> 8463 13 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-6
>> 87: 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth2-7
>
> Reformatted your output
>
>> If I understand correctly the RSS hash is used to dispatch the packets
>> into the different queues running on the different CPU.
>
> It looks like most interrupts go to eth2-0, a few go to eth2-6. The rx
> ring for eth2-0 is for non-IP packets. The RSS hash will hash IP
> packets and place them on eth2-1 to eth2-7. eth2-0 also handles tx
> interrupts for TX ring 0. TX traffic is hashed by the stack.
>
> What kind of traffic is passing through eth2?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists