netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/3] ethtool: Change ethtool_op_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100703120729.f2a2715b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Sat, 3 Jul 2010 12:07:29 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, sgruszka@...hat.com,
	amit.salecha@...gic.com, amwang@...hat.com,
	anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com, dm@...lsio.com, scofeldm@...co.com,
	vkolluri@...co.com, roprabhu@...co.com,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
	gallatin@...i.com, brice@...i.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	jgarzik@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/3] ethtool: Change ethtool_op_set_flags
 to validate flags

On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:07:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:

> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 09:55:14 -0700
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:44:32 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ int ethtool_op_set_tso(struct net_device *dev, u32 data);
> >>  u32 ethtool_op_get_ufo(struct net_device *dev);
> >>  int ethtool_op_set_ufo(struct net_device *dev, u32 data);
> >>  u32 ethtool_op_get_flags(struct net_device *dev);
> >> -int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data);
> >> +int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data, u32 supported);
> > 
> > That one-line change is missing from linux-next-20100702, causing:
> > 
> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ethtool.c:157: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
> 
> Strange, it's in net-next-2.6 for sure:
> 
> davem@...set:~/src/GIT/net-next-2.6$ egrep ethtool_op_set_flags include/linux/ethtool.h
> int ethtool_op_set_flags(struct net_device *dev, u32 data, u32 supported);

Yep, my bad.

In include/linux/ethtool.h, struct ethtool_ops, field/member 'set_flags':

	int	(*set_flags)(struct net_device *, u32);

Does that need another u32 for 'supported'?  This is where the linux-next
warnings are coming from.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html