lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Jul 2010 11:11:34 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Narendra K <Narendra_K@...l.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, matt_domsch@...l.com,
	jordan_hargrave@...l.com, charles_rose@...l.com,
	vijay_nijhawan@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Export firmware assigned labels of network devices
 to sysfs

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:48:26PM -0500, Narendra K wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:52 AM
> > To: K, Narendra
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; Domsch, Matt; Hargrave, Jordan; Rose,
> > Charles; Nijhawan, Vijay
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Export firmware assigned labels of network
> > devices to sysfs
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:52:18PM -0500, Narendra K wrote:
> > > 
> > > 'device_create_file' takes 'struct device_attribute *' as a param
> > which 
> > > we have not used here because  'struct device_attribute' does not have
> > .test
> > > member which we needed in this patch.
> > 
> > Why do you need it?  What is calling that function?  What am I missing
> > here?
> 
> The function 'pci_create_smbiosname_file' below is calling the .test method.
> For every pdev the function checks if it has a SMBIOS string associated
> with it or not. If there is no string (and instance) associated, then the
> attributes 'label' and 'instance' are not created for that pdev.
> To check for the existance of the string, the .test method is needed and
> it is not available in 'struct device_attribute'. It provides 
> .show and .store. We need a .show and .test. So we defined 

{sigh}

So, you just reinvented the is_visible function in struct
attribute_group?  Please use the infrastructure already available to do
this, it saves on code and debugging and review time.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ