netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 -net-2.6] ll_temac: fix DMA resources leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:09:51 +0400
From:	Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>
To:	Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
CC:	Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...a.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	john.linn@...inx.com, brian.hill@...inx.com,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, jpirko@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -net-2.6] ll_temac: fix DMA resources leak

On 07/09/2010 09:59 PM, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 15:43 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 20:24 +0000, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> V2: Check pointers before releasing resources.
>>>
>>> Fix DMA resources leak.
>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
>>> index fa303c8..b57d0ff 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c
>>> @@ -193,6 +193,35 @@ static int temac_dcr_setup(struct temac_local *lp, struct of_device *op,
>>>  #endif
>>>  
>>>  /**
>>> + *  * temac_dma_bd_release - Release buffer descriptor rings
>>> + */
>>> +static void temac_dma_bd_release(struct net_device *ndev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct temac_local *lp = netdev_priv(ndev);
>>> +	int i;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < RX_BD_NUM; i++) {
>>> +		if (!lp->rx_skb[i])
>>> +			break;
>>> +		else {
>>> +			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, lp->rx_bd_v[i].phys,
>>> +					XTE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>> +			dev_kfree_skb(lp->rx_skb[i]);
>>> +		}
>>> +	}
>> This cycle is needed only if (lp->rx_skb != NULL).
>>
>>> +	if (lp->rx_bd_v)
>>> +		dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent,
>>> +				sizeof(*lp->rx_bd_v) * RX_BD_NUM,
>>> +				lp->rx_bd_v, lp->rx_bd_p);
>>> +	if (lp->tx_bd_v)
>>> +		dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent,
>>> +				sizeof(*lp->tx_bd_v) * TX_BD_NUM,
>>> +				lp->tx_bd_v, lp->tx_bd_p);
>> After temac_dma_bd_release() lp->rx_bd_v and lp->rx_bd_p are freed but
>> are nonzero. If lp->rx_skb allocation fails second time then these DMA's
>> would be freed second time.
>> lp->tx_bd_v = lp->rx_bd_v = NULL here fixes this.
>>
>>> +	if (lp->rx_skb)
>>> +		kfree(lp->rx_skb);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>>   * temac_dma_bd_init - Setup buffer descriptor rings
>>>   */
>>>  static int temac_dma_bd_init(struct net_device *ndev)
>>> @@ -275,6 +304,7 @@ static int temac_dma_bd_init(struct net_device *ndev)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  
>>>  out:
>>> +	temac_dma_bd_release(ndev);
>>>  	return -ENOMEM;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -858,6 +888,8 @@ static int temac_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
>>>  		phy_disconnect(lp->phy_dev);
>>>  	lp->phy_dev = NULL;
>>>  
>>> +	temac_dma_bd_release(ndev);
>>> +
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
> I've fixed it in PATCH v3.
Could you please fix this on the top on the previous one.
Thanks.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=127869815002994&w=2
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html