[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100709122233.GB18487@verge.net.au>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:22:33 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, karl@...amoto.org,
linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] atm: propagate signal changes via notifier
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:16:10AM -0400, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:34:47 +0200
> >
> > /* Like
> > * this.
> > */
> >
> > not:
> >
> > /*
> > * Like
> > * this.
> > */
> >
> > Honestly, I don't know how I can be more clear about this :-)
>
> this is somewhat contrary to the suggested multi-line format given in
> Documentation/CodingStyle:
>
>
> The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
>
> /*
> * This is the preferred style for multi-line
> * comments in the Linux kernel source code.
> * Please use it consistently.
> *
> * Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
> * with beginning and ending almost-blank lines.
> */
This is a topic that seems to come up every now and again.
I think that the reality of the situation is that there
are several acceptable styles and some maintainers prefer
one over the other, some more strongly than others.
So I think that documentation is slightly misleading
though it is certainly true for many maintainers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists