[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C394C5E.2000805@chelsio.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:45:18 -0700
From: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@...lsio.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet, inet6: make tcp_sendmsg() and tcp_sendpage() through
inet_sendmsg() and inet_sendpage()
Changli Gao wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index 3ceb025..1e5bad1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -727,28 +727,31 @@ int inet_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
>
> /* We may need to bind the socket. */
> - if (!inet_sk(sk)->inet_num && inet_autobind(sk))
> + if (!sk->sk_prot->no_autobind &&
> + !inet_sk(sk)->inet_num && inet_autobind(sk))
> return -EAGAIN;
I think it's better to test inet_num first since usually it's not 0. With
the above ordering protocols with no_autobind==false end up making two
comparisons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists