[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278923239.32614.1.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:27:18 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de, matthew@....cx, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] drivers/scsi: Remove warnings after vsprintf
%pV introduction
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 23:10 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:08:41 -0700
>
> > On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 19:52 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> Could you take a stab at this and the other scsi bits that
> >> trigger this warning?
> >
> > Remove warnings introduced by conversions of dev_<level>
> > macros to functions.
> >
> > Compile tested only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> SCSI folks, the background is that we have moved the dev_*() printk
> macros to external functions, so that the prefixing printf strings
> don't get emitting at every call site.
>
> As a consequence, dev_*() calls that try to use an empty string as the
> printf format emit a warning from gcc since an empty constant string
> is not a valid printf format.
>
> That's what this change is all about.
Thanks, that explains the "" -> " " conversions.
What's the other 60% of the patch about? the strange addition of
scsi_show_extd_sense_args() and all the KERN_CONT bits?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists