netdev - Re: [PATCH repost] sched: export sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C3C0EBC.40305@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:59:08 -0700
From:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH repost] sched: export sched_set/getaffinity to modules

On 7/4/2010 2:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:06:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>    
>> On 07/02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>      
>>> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:01 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>>>        
>>>>   Does  it (Tejun's kthread_clone() patch) also  inherit the
>>>> cgroup of the caller?
>>>>          
>>> Of course, its a simple do_fork() which inherits everything just as you
>>> would expect from a similar sys_clone()/sys_fork() call.
>>>        
>> Yes. And I'm afraid it can inherit more than we want. IIUC, this is called
>> from ioctl(), right?
>>
>> Then the new thread becomes the natural child of the caller, and it shares
>> ->mm with the parent. And files, dup_fd() without CLONE_FS.
>>
>> Signals. Say, if you send SIGKILL to this new thread, it can't sleep in
>> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE or KILLABLE after that. And this SIGKILL can be sent
>> just because the parent gets SIGQUIT or abother coredumpable signal.
>> Or the new thread can recieve SIGSTOP via ^Z.
>>
>> Perhaps this is OK, I do not know. Just to remind that kernel_thread()
>> is merely clone(CLONE_VM).
>>
>> Oleg.
>>      
>
> Right. Doing this might break things like flush.  The signal and exit
> behaviour needs to be examined carefully. I am also unsure whether
> using such threads might be more expensive than inheriting kthreadd.
>
>    
Should we just leave it to the userspace to set the cgroup/cpumask after 
qemu starts the guest and
the vhost threads?

Thanks
Sridhar


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html