[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100714.141118.260092331.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sbhatewara@...are.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pv-drivers@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.35-rc1] net-next: vmxnet3 fixes [5/5] Respect the
interrupt type in VM configuration
From: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Do not ignore interrupt type in VM configuration
>
> When interrupt type is not auto, do not ignore the interrupt type set from
> VM configuration.
> Driver may not always respect the interrupt type in configuration but it
> will certainly try to. Eg: if MSIx is configured and enabling MSIx fails
> in driver, it fall back on MSI and then on INTx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@...are.com>
...
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ vmxnet3_set_flags(struct net_device *netdev, u32 data)
>
> /* update harware LRO capability accordingly */
> if (lro_requested)
> - adapter->shared->devRead.misc.uptFeatures &= UPT1_F_LRO;
> + adapter->shared->devRead.misc.uptFeatures |= UPT1_F_LRO;
> else
This change has nothing to do with respecting the VM interrupt setting.
Do not stuff unrelated changes into a commit.
I have to be frank with you, this patch series... it stinks.
It papers over races with incorrect tests, unrelated changes are mixed
together, it fixes RX ring exhaustion incorrectly, it illegals starts a
transmit queue before the device is every brought up, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists