netdev - Re: [RFC 0/2] netfilter: xtables: CONDITION target implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTilRtCiuAwox2sTsEu73fE89OLEUtIbVQ_njtkqz@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:27:25 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, jengelh@...ozas.de, sameo@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] netfilter: xtables: CONDITION target implementation

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Luciano Coelho
<luciano.coelho@...ia.com> wrote:
> From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...tbed.(none)>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed earlier, I've been looking for a way to enable and disable the
> condition match automatically, in the netfilter tables themselves (ie. without
> the need to use procfs).
>
> This is my initial implementation.  Please let me know how it looks.  The first
> patch is based on the xt_condition patch that Jan sent to the list (but which
> has not been finalized for inclusion yet).  Once the condition match gets
> applied, I'll forward port my patch and submit it again.
>
> Cheers,
> Luca.
>
> Luciano Coelho (2):
>  netfilter: xt_condition: export list management code
>  netfilter: xtables: implement CONDITION target
>
>  include/linux/netfilter/Kbuild         |    1 +
>  include/linux/netfilter/xt_CONDITION.h |   39 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h |   17 +++++-
>  net/netfilter/Kconfig                  |   12 ++++
>  net/netfilter/Makefile                 |    1 +
>  net/netfilter/xt_CONDITION.c           |  112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/netfilter/xt_condition.c           |   82 ++++++++++++++----------

Why not combine xt_CONDITION.c and xt_condition.c into xt_condition.c,
like xt_mark.c?


-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html