[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100720052645.GA5214@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:26:45 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, shemminger@...tta.com, frzhang@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, amwang@...hat.com, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:05:03AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I thought we did that already.... oh I see, we did it for bonding:
>
> commit c22d7ac844f1cb9c6a5fd20f89ebadc2feef891b
> Author: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> Date: Fri Jun 25 09:50:44 2010 +0000
>
> bonding: prevent netpoll over bonded interfaces
>
> I'm fine with disabling it for bridging too, just send me a patch
> similar to the bonding one.
OK, here is a minimal patch to remove the offending bits of the
bridge netpoll support.
Note that this patch needs to be reverted in net-next-2.6 as
bridge netpoll works correctly there.
bridge: Partially disable netpoll support
The new netpoll code in bridging contains use-after-free bugs
that are non-trivial to fix.
This patch fixes this by removing the code that uses skbs after
they're freed.
As a consequence, this means that we can no longer call bridge
from the netpoll path, so this patch also removes the controller
function in order to disable netpoll.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
index eedf2c9..753fc42 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
@@ -217,14 +217,6 @@ static bool br_devices_support_netpoll(struct net_bridge *br)
return count != 0 && ret;
}
-static void br_poll_controller(struct net_device *br_dev)
-{
- struct netpoll *np = br_dev->npinfo->netpoll;
-
- if (np->real_dev != br_dev)
- netpoll_poll_dev(np->real_dev);
-}
-
void br_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
@@ -295,7 +287,6 @@ static const struct net_device_ops br_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_do_ioctl = br_dev_ioctl,
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
.ndo_netpoll_cleanup = br_netpoll_cleanup,
- .ndo_poll_controller = br_poll_controller,
#endif
};
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
index a4e72a8..595da45 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
@@ -50,14 +50,7 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
kfree_skb(skb);
else {
skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
- if (unlikely(skb->dev->priv_flags & IFF_IN_NETPOLL)) {
- netpoll_send_skb(skb->dev->npinfo->netpoll, skb);
- skb->dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
- } else
-#endif
- dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ dev_queue_xmit(skb);
}
}
@@ -73,23 +66,9 @@ int br_forward_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
static void __br_deliver(const struct net_bridge_port *to, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
- struct net_bridge *br = to->br;
- if (unlikely(br->dev->priv_flags & IFF_IN_NETPOLL)) {
- struct netpoll *np;
- to->dev->npinfo = skb->dev->npinfo;
- np = skb->dev->npinfo->netpoll;
- np->real_dev = np->dev = to->dev;
- to->dev->priv_flags |= IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
- }
-#endif
skb->dev = to->dev;
NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_OUT, skb, NULL, skb->dev,
br_forward_finish);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
- if (skb->dev->npinfo)
- skb->dev->npinfo->netpoll->dev = br->dev;
-#endif
}
static void __br_forward(const struct net_bridge_port *to, struct sk_buff *skb)
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists