| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:11:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> To: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...ia.com> cc: "netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>, "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC v2] netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target On Tuesday 2010-07-20 13:04, Luciano Coelho wrote: > >Yes, I made this patch on top of the one you have sent earlier for >upstream inclusion. There were some comments from Patrick to that one >and, as I said in my email yesterday, I'll rebase the target patches >once the original one is included upstream. The original one won't be - that is, basically you will be making the initial upstream submission. However, you are right; fabricating two patches is a good idea and is in fact what I advertise too (xt_TEE discussion about specifying oif..) - avoiding a singular huge patch is a best practice. Just be sure to have condition plus its 32-bit upgrade patch merged at the same time. >Do you want me to take a look at Patrick's comments and resubmit the >patch you've sent with the changes Patrick asked for? Yes. Not obeying His Highness's wishes is a death nail for a module ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists