[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinPtd2xXzq0MpR517OsbZWUZjdp25x8FndhQ2CP@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:08:58 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
Cc: Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: introduce STPID switch
tagging handling code
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:35, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:29:30AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> + source_port = dsa_header[1] & 0x03;
>> >> + if (source_port >= DSA_MAX_PORTS || ds->ports[source_port] == NULL)
>> >> + goto out_drop;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (((dsa_header[0] & ETH_P_8021QH) == ETH_P_8021QH) &&
>> >
>> > This is bogus -- what it does is:
>> >
>> > if ((dsa_header[0] & 0x81) == 0x81)
>> >
>> > It doesn't look like you need to mask here at all.
>>
>> where does it say dsa_header[0] will always have 0x81 set ?
>
> Eh?
>
> This code is checking whether the packet has a STPID tag on it or not.
> A STPID tag exists if the first 12 nibbles are 0x810.
>
> You are checking whether the first 8 nibbles of this are equal to 0x81
> by doing:
>
> if ((byte & 0x81) == 0x81)
>
> What if the first byte is 0x93? Or 0xc5?
that was my point. should it be masking or doing a raw compare ?
i have nfc as i had nothing to do with the creation of this code. i
dont know the first thing about VLAN tags or anything else at that
level.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists