[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100721.220611.267376790.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, paul.moore@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add post recvmsg() hook.
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:02:16 +0900
> Then, why does below proposal lose information?
Peek changes state, now it's possible that two processes end up
receiving the packet.
Please consider deeply how your desired semantics are unobtainable
without breaking thigngs fundamentally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists