[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100723193456.GS7497@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:34:56 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: set device in RLB ARP packet handler
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com> wrote:
> With commit 6146b1a4, the dev field in the RLB ARP packet handler was
> set to NULL to wildcard and accommodate balancing VLANs on top of
> bonds.
>
> This has the side-effect of the packet handler being called against
> other, non RLB-enabled bonds, and a kernel oops results when it tries
> to
> dereference rx_hashtbl in rlb_update_entry_from_arp(), which won't be
> set for those bonds, e.g. active-backup.
>
> With the __netif_receive_skb() changes from commit 1f3c8804, frames
> received on VLANs correctly make their way to the bond's handler,
> so we no longer need to wildcard the device.
>
I see this problem as well, but I would propose to fix it another way to
not alter the receive path so close to the release of 2.6.35 and to
catch this for 802.3ad bonds as well.
> Signed-off-by: Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com>
> ---
> Jay,
>
> The oops can be reproduced by:
>
> modprobe bonding
>
> echo active-backup > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode
> echo 100 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/miimon
> ifconfig bond0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> echo +eth0 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
> echo +eth1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
>
> echo +bond1 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
> echo balance-alb > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/mode
> echo 100 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/miimon
> ifconfig bond1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> echo +eth2 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/slaves
> echo +eth3 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/slaves
>
> Pass some traffic on bond0. Boom.
>
bonding: make sure mode-specific handlers handle appropriate frames
This patch will exit out of rlb_arp_recv and bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv early
if the bond receiving the frame isn't using that mode.
Fixes problem reported by Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com>.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 3 ++-
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 822f586..cf7b08d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -2463,7 +2463,8 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct pac
struct slave *slave = NULL;
int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
- if (!(dev->flags & IFF_MASTER))
+ if (!(dev->flags & IFF_MASTER) ||
+ (bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_8023AD))
goto out;
read_lock(&bond->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index df48307..a82e38c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void rlb_update_entry_from_arp(struct bonding *bond, struct arp_pkt *arp)
static int rlb_arp_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev, struct packet_type *ptype, struct net_device *orig_dev)
{
- struct bonding *bond;
+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct arp_pkt *arp = (struct arp_pkt *)skb->data;
int res = NET_RX_DROP;
@@ -361,7 +361,8 @@ static int rlb_arp_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev, struct
bond_dev = vlan_dev_real_dev(bond_dev);
if (!(bond_dev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING) ||
- !(bond_dev->flags & IFF_MASTER))
+ !(bond_dev->flags & IFF_MASTER) ||
+ (bond->params.mode != BOND_MODE_ALB))
goto out;
if (!arp) {
@@ -376,7 +377,6 @@ static int rlb_arp_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev, struct
if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REPLY)) {
/* update rx hash table for this ARP */
- bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
rlb_update_entry_from_arp(bond, arp);
pr_debug("Server received an ARP Reply from client\n");
}
--
1.6.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists