[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m31vai1n7a.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:23:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH staging] Add SBE 2T3E3 WAN driver
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
>> These entries are also needed for the tulip Ethernet driver, to avoid
>> initializing these ports (they are using Tulip DECchips with custom FPGA
>> for HDLC). I posted a patch on netdev list.
>
> Then make the patch part of that submission, I can't add non-staging
> patches to the drivers/staging/ tree if at all possible.
I did, I just didn't want a dependency and thus the change to
pci_ids.h is present in both patches, with the assumption git will take
care of it when merging.
>> The main reason is the interface ("PRIVATE" netdev ioctls) for
>> controlling the hdlcX devices is not stable. The plan is to write a new
>> user-kernel interface for generic HDLC, this driver (and other ones)
>> will then use it. For now, there is a separate utility from SBE for this
>> card.
>
> Ah, ick. Is this going to be fixed up anytime soon?
Well, I hope so. Depends on the definition of "soon", though. Something
like several months, realistically.
> Care to respin this with the TODO file?`
Will do, sure.
> And look, you do have a copy of the file, right there. Care to post it
> somewhere? We need to see the license and other markings on it to know
> about this driver, right? Where did you get it from?
I got it from a friend along with a card. That's exactly what they
received from SBE. It's a driver for older Linux only, something like
up to 2.6.20 maybe. I'm told they have no newer version (i.e. working
with newer kernels; they may have a version with the new company name).
SBE (embedded devices division?) doesn't exist anymore, but this
particular piece of hardware is there:
http://www.onestopsystems.com/communication_wan_f.php
I posted the driver here:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~chris/SBE_2T3_Linux_2.0c.tgz
>> It seems the DRV_NAME is only used for various printk() and for
>> pci_request_regions(). Does it still cause problems?
>
> It's not nice, hopefully you can fix it up. Well, remove it entirely
> would be good, but you can add that to the TODO file :)
Ah, doing a simple search & replace isn't a problem for me. Just wanted
to confirm it's not nice.
Will post a revised patch shortly, of course.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists