netdev - Re: RFC: New BPF 'LOOP' instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72ff93eb4581b198faa6ce62d2b5162b@chewa.net>
Date:	Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:09:53 +0200
From:	Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>
To:	Paul LeoNerd Evans <leonerd@...nerd.org.uk>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: New BPF 'LOOP' instruction


On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:34:43 +0100, Paul LeoNerd Evans
<leonerd@...nerd.org.uk> wrote:
> What if we added a new constant SKF_TRANS_OFF to store the start address
> of the transport header, and a new SKF_AD storage area for the transport
> protocol:
(...)
> Does this sound workable?

The network header has not been processed by the time the skbuff hits the
packet socket. So the transport header offset is not defined yet.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html