Message-ID: <FE9BFA4C-11AB-46B9-A514-EB62467A1BB7@marvell.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:02:30 -0700
From:	Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>
To:	Sachin Sanap <ssanap@...vell.com>
CC:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ashish Karkare <akarkare@...vell.com>,
	Prabhanjan Sarnaik <sarnaik@...vell.com>,
	"eric.y.miao@...il.com" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <markb@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add Fast Ethernet driver for PXA168.

Sachin,

I assume TX_DONE_INTERVAL is related to the number of  tx descriptors in the ring and if so should be defined from the common base size .

+#define TX_DONE_INTERVAL     30

eg

#define TX_DONE_INTERVAL  (NUM_TX_DESCS/2) 

Philp



On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Sachin Sanap wrote:

> Thanks Lennert,Eric for your review. Comments inline. I will resend the modified patch as a reply to this email.
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:17:50PM +0530, Sachin Sanap wrote:
>> 
>>> This patch adds support for PXA168 Fast Ethernet on Aspenite
>>> board.
>> 
>> There's nothing Aspenite-specific in this patch (nor should there be),
>> so you can leave that part out.
> 
> Removed.
>> 
>> 
>>> Patch generated against Linux 2.6.35-rc5
>>> commit cd5b8f8755a89a57fc8c408d284b8b613f090345
>> 
>> This might be interesting to know but shouldn't be part of the commit
>> message.
> 
> Removed.
>> 
>> 
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168_eth.h
>> b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168_eth.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..abfd335
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168_eth.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + *pxa168 ethernet platform device data definition file.
>>> + */
>>> +#ifndef __LINUX_PXA168_ETH_H
>>> +#define __LINUX_PXA168_ETH_H
>> 
>> This should just be in include/linux, IMHO, as this unit isn't only used
>> in the PXA168, for one.
> I have moved it to include/linux but the PXA168 name is still there.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +struct pxa168_eth_platform_data {
>>> +	int	port_number;
>>> +	u16	phy_addr;
>>> +
>>> +	/* If speed is 0, then speed and duplex are autonegotiated. */
>>> +	u32	speed;		/* 0, SPEED_10, SPEED_100 */
>>> +	u32	duplex;		/* DUPLEX_HALF or DUPLEX_FULL */
>> 
>> phylib treats these three (phy address, speed and duplex) as ints, is
>> there any reason you need these to be of different types?
> 
> 
> Used int at all three places.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +	int (*init)(void);
>> 
>> What's this needed for?  The name of this callback is entirely
>> nondescriptive, there's no comment as to when it's called, etc.
> 
> Added a comment for it.
>> 
>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
>>> index ce2fcdd..5ebf287 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
>>> @@ -927,6 +927,16 @@ config SMC91X
>>> 	  The module will be called smc91x.  If you want to compile it as a
>>> 	  module, say M here and read
>> <file:Documentation/kbuild/modules.txt>.
>>> 
>>> +config PXA168_ETH
>>> +	tristate "Marvell pxa168 ethernet support"
>>> +	depends on MACH_ASPENITE
>> 
>> You can have it depend on ARM or PXA168, but having it depend on support
>> for one specific board support file is almost certainly wrong.
> 
> Depends on CPU_PXA168.
>> 
>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/pxa168_eth.c b/drivers/net/pxa168_eth.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..618e558
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/pxa168_eth.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1723 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Driver for PXA168 based boards.
>> 
>> Why not call this "PXA168 ethernet driver"?
> Change done.
>> 
>> 
>>> + * Based on MV643XX driver.
>> 
>> The mv643xx ethernet driver, that is.
> Change done.
>> 
>> 
>>> +#define DRIVER_NAME	"pxa168-mfu"
>> 
>> mfu?
> Its was for multi function unit on Aspenite, changed it to pxa168-eth 
>> 
>> 
>>> +/* smi register */
>>> +#define SMI_BUSY		(1<<28)	/* 0 - Write, 1 - Read  */
>>> +#define SMI_R_VALID		(1<<27)	/* 0 - Write, 1 - Read  */
>>> +#define SMI_OP_W		(0<<26)	/* Write operation      */
>>> +#define SMI_OP_R		(1<<26)	/* Read operation */
>> 
>> (1 << 28)
>> (1 << 27)
>> (0 << 26)
>> 
>> etc (thoughout the file)
> Changed.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +struct pxa168_private {
>> 
>> ITYM pxa168_eth_private
> Yes, changed.
>> 
>> 
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Used in case RX Ring is empty, which can be caused when
>>> +	 * system does not have resources (skb's)
>>> +	 */
>> 
>> can be caused by
>> can occur when
> Changed.
>> 
>> 
>>> +	struct timer_list timeout;
>>> +	struct mii_bus *smi_bus;
>>> +	struct phy_device *phy;
>>> +
>>> +	/* clock */
>>> +	struct clk *clk;
>>> +	struct pxa168_eth_platform_data *pd;
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Ethernet controller base address.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	void __iomem *base;
>>> +
>>> +	u8 *htpr;		/* hash pointer */
>> 
>> IMHO it'd look better if you'd either always put the comment on the same
>> line or put the comment above the member (within the same struct).
>> 
>> Also, 'hash pointer' as a comment isn't very helpful.  Making it
>> 'hardware address filter table' or so would be more descriptive.
> Changed.
>> 
>> 
>>> +struct addr_table_entry {
>>> +	u32 lo;
>>> +	u32 hi;
>>> +};
>> 
>> If the address filter table consists of these structures, it's
>> confusing to make htpr a u8 * and then cast things around.  Better make
>> htpr a void * then.
> Changed.
>> 
>> Also, what about endian-cleanness?  If you run the CPU core in big
>> endian, will the address filter table handling logic in this driver
>> still work?
> 
> 
> Added cpu_to_le32 for the mac_high and mac_low variables before passing them to the add_del_hash_entry. I have not tested it on the Big endian but I think it should now work.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +static char marvell_OUI[3] = { 0x02, 0x50, 0x43 };
>> 
>> This isn't even a marvell OUI -- 00:50:43 is a marvell OUI, and
>> anything with 02: is a locally generated address.
>> 
>> Why don't you just use random_ether_addr()?
> Changed to use random_ether_addr.
>> 
>> 
>>> +static inline u32 rdl(struct pxa168_private *mp, int offset)
>>> +{
>>> +	return readl(mp->base + offset);
>>> +}
>> 
>> In mv643xx_eth, 'mp' refers to mv643xx_eth_private, it's funny that
>> you've changed the name of the struct but not that of the variable.
>> 
>> As the rest of the driver looks very very similar to mv643xx_eth, if
>> not pretty much entirely identical in a lot of places, you should give
>> more credit to mv643xx_eth than 'based on', in my opinion.
> Changed the credit line for the same.
>> 
>> 
>>> +static int ethernet_phy_get(struct pxa168_private *mp)
>>> +{
>>> +	unsigned int reg_data;
>>> +
>>> +	/* only support 3 ports */
>>> +	BUG_ON(mp->port_num > 2);
>> 
>> Hm, does it actually support 3 ports?
> No. changed the code.
>> 
>> 
>>> +static void ethernet_phy_set_addr(struct pxa168_private *mp, int
>> phy_addr)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 reg_data;
>>> +	int addr_shift = 5 * mp->port_num;
>>> +
>>> +	/* only support 3 ports */
>>> +	BUG_ON(mp->port_num > 2);
>>> +
>>> +	reg_data = rdl(mp, PHY_ADDRESS);
>>> +	reg_data &= ~(0x1f << addr_shift);
>>> +	reg_data |= (phy_addr & 0x1f) << addr_shift;
>>> +	wrl(mp, PHY_ADDRESS, reg_data);
>>> +}
>>> +static void ethernet_phy_reset(struct pxa168_private *mp)
>>> +{
>> 
>> Blank line between functions.
>> 
>> 
>>> +	do {
>>> +		data = phy_read(mp->phy, MII_BMCR);
>>> +	} while (data >= 0 && data & BMCR_RESET);
>>> +
>>> +}
>> 
>> No blank line here.
>> 
>> 
>>> +static void rxq_refill(struct net_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct pxa168_private *mp = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> +	struct rx_desc *p_used_rx_desc;
>>> +	int used_rx_desc;
>>> +
>>> +	while (mp->rx_desc_count < mp->rx_ring_size) {
>>> +
>>> +		skb = dev_alloc_skb(MAX_PKT_SIZE + ETH_HW_IP_ALIGN);
>> 
>> No blank line here.
>> 
>> 
>>> +	if (mp->rx_desc_count == 0) {
>>> +		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Rx ring is empty\n", dev->name);
>> 
>> I wouldn't printk for this (and certainly not without a rate limit) --
>> going OOM will then just mean that you'll get endless console spam as
>> well, which isn't helpful.
> Hm, removed the printk.
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> +/*
>>> + * --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>> + * This function will calculate the hash function of the address.
>>> + * depends on the hash mode and hash size.
>> 
>> Where are the hash mode and size configured?
>> 
>> 
>>> +static u32 hash_function(u32 mac_high, u32 mac_low)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 hash_result;
>>> +	u32 addr_high;
>>> +	u32 addr_low;
>>> +	u32 addr0;
>>> +	u32 addr1;
>>> +	u32 addr2;
>>> +	u32 addr3;
>>> +	u32 addr_high_swapped;
>>> +	u32 addr_low_swapped;
>>> +
>>> +	addr_high = nibble_swapping_16_bit(mac_high);
>>> +	addr_low = nibble_swapping_32_bit(mac_low);
>>> +
>>> +	addr_high_swapped = flip_4_bits(addr_high & 0xf)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_high >> 4) & 0xf)) << 4)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_high >> 8) & 0xf)) << 8)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_high >> 12) & 0xf)) << 12);
>>> +
>>> +	addr_low_swapped = flip_4_bits(addr_low & 0xf)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 4) & 0xf)) << 4)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 8) & 0xf)) << 8)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 12) & 0xf)) << 12)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 16) & 0xf)) << 16)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 20) & 0xf)) << 20)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 24) & 0xf)) << 24)
>>> +	    + ((flip_4_bits((addr_low >> 28) & 0xf)) << 28);
>>> +
>>> +	addr_high = addr_high_swapped;
>>> +	addr_low = addr_low_swapped;
>>> +
>>> +	addr0 = (addr_low >> 2) & 0x03f;
>>> +	addr1 = (addr_low & 0x003) | ((addr_low >> 8) & 0x7f) << 2;
>>> +	addr2 = (addr_low >> 15) & 0x1ff;
>>> +	addr3 = ((addr_low >> 24) & 0x0ff) | ((addr_high & 1) << 8);
>>> +
>>> +	hash_result = (addr0 << 9) | (addr1 ^ addr2 ^ addr3);
>>> +	hash_result = hash_result & 0x07ff;
>>> +	return hash_result;
>> 
>> As it's only a bunch of XORs, can you not calculate the hash function
>> first and only then do the bit reversal?
>> 
>> 
>>> + * --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>> + * This function will add an entry to the address table.
>>> + * depends on the hash mode and hash size that was initialized.
>>> + * Inputs
>>> + * mp - ETHERNET .
>>> + * mac_high - the 2 most significant bytes of the MAC address.
>>> + * mac_low - the 4 least significant bytes of the MAC address.
>>> + * skip - if 1, skip this address.
>> 
>> What does 'skip' do?
>> 
>> 
>>> + * rd   - the RD field in the address table.
>> 
>> And what does that do?
> 
> Added more comments regarding the address filtering and the hash function.
> 
>> 
>> If one has hardware docs, this comment doesn't really add anything,
>> while if one doesn't have hardware docs, this comment doesn't really
>> explain anything -- so the comment isn't very useful.
>> 
>> 
>>> +static void update_hash_table_mac_address(struct pxa168_private *mp,
>>> +					  u8 *oaddr, u8 *addr)
>>> [...]
>>> +static int init_hashtable(struct pxa168_private *mp)
>> 
>> hash_table?
>> 
>> 
>>> +{
>>> +	u8 *addr;
>>> +	dma_addr_t reg_dma;
>>> +
>>> +	if (mp->htpr == NULL) {
>>> +		mp->htpr = dma_alloc_coherent(NULL,
>>> +					      HASH_ADDR_TABLE_SIZE + 7,
>>> +					      &mp->htpr_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +		if (mp->htpr == NULL)
>>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	/* align to 8 byte boundary */
>>> +	addr = (u8 *) (((u32) mp->htpr + 7) & ~0x7);
>>> +	reg_dma = (dma_addr_t) (((u32) mp->htpr_dma + 7) & ~0x7);
>> 
>> DMA-API-HOWTO.txt says about dma_alloc_coherent():
>> 
>> 	The cpu return address and the DMA bus master address are both
>> 	guaranteed to be aligned to the smallest PAGE_SIZE order which
>> 	is greater than or equal to the requested size.
>> 
>> So this shuffling isn't needed.
> 
> Hm, removed the shuffling code.
>> 
>> 
>> etc etc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists