[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100810.014846.258126767.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: greearb@...delatech.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: Missing device binding relating to tcp_v4_send_reset?
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:46:26 -0700
> This snippet is from some patches Patrick did for me some time
> back. I think the rest of his work has been merged upstream, but
> this patch was not. I'm honestly not sure if it's needed or not,
> but we've been running with it for at least a year or so and it's
> been working fine for us.
There is no reason at all to force a reply to a packet to
go out of the same interface as the packet which triggered
that reply arrived upon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists