netdev - iproute2 question on flushing addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C62D763.4080804@candelatech.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:01:23 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: iproute2 question on flushing addresses

I am trying to flush all secondary IPs before flushing primaries, because
otherwise it creates a flood of netlink messages as each primary is deleted
and a secondary takes over as primary (changing all routes for all other
secondaries).

I was thinking this command could work, but it does not appear to do
anything:

./local/sbin/ip addr flush dev rddVR17 secondary

While poking at the code..I saw this.  It seems to me that the check for IFA_F_SECONDARY
is reversed?

int print_addrinfo_primary(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
			   void *arg)
{
	struct ifaddrmsg *ifa = NLMSG_DATA(n);

	if (!ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
		return 0;

	return print_addrinfo(who, n, arg);
}

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html