[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C6444EA.1070704@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:00:58 -0400
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute2] iproute2: Fix 'addr flush secondary' logic.
On 08/11/2010 06:48 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Looks like the code was broken in several different places.
>
> * It ran only a single filter if there were multiple.
> * Don't want to flush in a loop if you are doing primary
> because otherwise promoted seconaries will get deleted
> for each additional loop (10 in upstream code).
> * No idea what a while (0); statement at the end of a for
> loop does, but I don't think it needed to be there!
>
> The attached patch makes it work for me, supporting
> flushing primary or secondary addresses.
> diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
> index 5f0789c..803df17 100644
> --- a/ip/ipaddress.c
> +++ b/ip/ipaddress.c
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ int print_addrinfo_primary(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> {
> struct ifaddrmsg *ifa = NLMSG_DATA(n);
>
> - if (!ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
> + if (ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
return 0;
This should be:
if (!(ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY))
as this function does the opposite of what it seems.
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ int print_addrinfo_secondary(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> {
> struct ifaddrmsg *ifa = NLMSG_DATA(n);
>
> - if (ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
> + if (!(ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY))
return 0;
>From testing, the original code here was correct.
> @@ -865,6 +865,13 @@ static int ipaddr_list_or_flush(int argc, char **argv, int flush)
> printf("\n*** Round %d, deleting %d addresses ***\n", round, filter.flushed);
> fflush(stdout);
> }
> +
> + /* If we are flushing, and specifying primary, then we want to flush only a single round.
> + * Otherwise, we'll start flushing secondaries that were promoted to primaries
> + */
> + if (!(filter.flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) && (filter.flagmask & IFA_F_SECONDARY)) {
> + return 0;
> + }
This doesn't seem to do anything, I see all my IPv4 addresses flushed if I
run 'ip -4 -s a flush primary dev eth2'. And it says it only deleted one
when it deleted two addresses :-/ Also, if it did work, it should really goto
a few lines above so it prints the summary stats:
if (filter.flushed == 0) {
flush_done:
if (show_stats) {
Even when I corrected the lines above, it didn't work:
# ip -4 a s dev eth2
2: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
inet 192.168.6.4/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global eth2
# ip a a 192.168.6.100/24 brd + dev eth2
# ip -4 a s dev eth2
2: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
inet 192.168.6.4/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global eth2
inet 192.168.6.100/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global secondary eth2
# ./ip -4 -s -s -o a flush primary dev eth2
2: eth2 inet 192.168.6.4/24 brd 192.168.6.255 scope global eth2
*** Round 1, deleting 1 addresses ***
[missing *** Flush is complete after 1 round ***]
# ip -4 a s dev eth2
[nothing]
Where did my .100 secondary address go? Now this will bug me until I figure
out why. Maybe it's because I'm booted to 2.6.32.
> diff --git a/lib/libnetlink.c b/lib/libnetlink.c
> index cfeb894..d18e8a0 100644
Can you give an example of how you tested this double filter change? My
distro /sbin/ip seemed to work just fine.
> - if (status) {
> + if (msglen) {
> fprintf(stderr, "!!!Remnant of size %d\n", status);
> exit(1);
> }
Should the arg to the fprintf() be msglen too?
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists