lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:34:38 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <>
To:	Grant Likely <>
	Krzysztof Halasa <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] ptp: Added a brand new class driver for ptp

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:11:30PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Richard Cochran
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clocks_lock); /* protects 'clocks' */
> Doesn't appear that clocks is manipulated at atomic context.  Mutex instead?
> If the spinlock is changed to a mutex that is held for the entire
> function call, then the logic here can be simpler.


I am working on another go at this patch series. Stupid question:

The caller of ptp_clock_register(), which takes the clocks_lock, is
always a module_init() function. Is this always a safe context in
which to call mutex_lock?



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists