[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100813143904.GA27261@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:39:04 -0400
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linville@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:42:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * rcu_read_lock_bh_irqsoff() - mark the beginning of an RCU-bh critical section
> + *
> + * This is equivalent of rcu_read_lock_bh(), but to be used where the
> + * caller either is in an irq handler or has irqs disabled. Note that
> + * this function assumes that PREEMPT_RT kernels run irq handlers at
> + * higher priority than softirq handlers!
> + */
> +static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh_irqsoff(void)
> +{
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh_irqsoff_check();
> + __acquire(RCU_BH);
> + rcu_read_acquire_bh();
> +}
Thanks for the patch Paul!
But this doesn't really solve the problem for netif_rx. The reason
is that netif_rx can either be called with IRQs on OR off. So we
need to take the right precautions in the case where IRQs are
enabled along with BH.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists