netdev - Re: MAINTAINERS: PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM: Should F: drivers/net/pcmcia/ be added?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100813185216.GB5853@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:52:16 +0200
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS: PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM: Should F: drivers/net/pcmcia/
 be added?

Hey,

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:47:52PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:22 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 17:34 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > look good from a PCMCIA point of view, therefore:
> > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
> 
> There's no maintainer entry for directory drivers/net/pcmcia/
> 
> Should
> 
> F:	drivers/net/pcmcia/
> 
> be added to the existing PCMCIA SUBSYSTEM entry?

in my opinion, no -- this entry is mostly about the PCMCIA core, not about
specific drivers, same as the PCI bus guys aren't maintaining each and every
PCI driver...

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html