[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C68F652.7070900@exinda.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:26:58 +1000
From: Stephen Buck <stephen.buck@...nda.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"hidden@....bme.hu" <hidden@....bme.hu>
Subject: Re: tproxy related crash in inet_hashtables
On 15/08/10 15:16, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Buck<stephen.buck@...nda.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:35:21 +1000
>
>
>> + }
>> + if (!node)
>> + tb = inet_bind_bucket_create(table->bind_bucket_cachep,
>> + sock_net(sk), head, port);
>> + }
>> sk_add_bind_node(child,&tb->owners);
>>
> inet_bind_bucket_create() can fail due to memory allocation failure,
> you're therefore going to have to find a way to handle that.
>
> And in doing so you're going to find out that there is no easy
> way out of this code path in such an error, this code was
> absolutely not designed to be able to handle cases like this.
>
You're right. I didn't cover the failure case. And no, it doesn't look easy.
I'll have another look at the problem when I get a chance.
Thanks for pointing it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists