[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C696014.4080508@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:58:12 -0400
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute2] iproute2: Fix 'addr flush secondary' logic.
On 08/13/2010 03:49 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch to fix some of the errors you
> mentioned. It also fixes a bug when '-s -s' is used: The old
> code modified the ifa flags, which made it not handle the check
> for primary v/s secondary correctly in the next filter.
Thanks for the update, nitpicking comments below.
BTW, promote_secondaries was the reason for some of my testing
issues as I don't usually run with that enabled.
diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
index 5f0789c..51b59b4 100644
--- a/ip/ipaddress.c
+++ b/ip/ipaddress.c
> @@ -571,40 +572,41 @@ int print_addrinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> abuf, sizeof(abuf)));
> }
> fprintf(fp, "scope %s ", rtnl_rtscope_n2a(ifa->ifa_scope, b1, sizeof(b1)));
> + ifa_flags = ifa->ifa_flags;
> if (ifa->ifa_flags&IFA_F_SECONDARY) {
Maybe put a comment as to the reason, so someone doesn't change it
back in the future:
/* Use local copy of flags to not interfere with filtering code */
> @@ -848,6 +850,7 @@ static int ipaddr_list_or_flush(int argc, char **argv, int flush)
> exit(1);
> }
> if (filter.flushed == 0) {
> + flush_done:
> if (show_stats) {
> if (round == 0)
> printf("Nothing to flush.\n");
Can you put "flush_done" at the beginning of the line?
> @@ -865,6 +868,13 @@ static int ipaddr_list_or_flush(int argc, char **argv, int flush)
> printf("\n*** Round %d, deleting %d addresses ***\n", round, filter.flushed);
> fflush(stdout);
> }
> +
> + /* If we are flushing, and specifying primary, then we want to flush only a single round.
> + * Otherwise, we'll start flushing secondaries that were promoted to primaries
> + */
> + if (!(filter.flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY) && (filter.flagmask & IFA_F_SECONDARY)) {
> + goto flush_done;
> + }
You don't need the {} here. Also, the comment line-wraps since it's
> 80 chars.
Everything seems to work correctly in my limited testing otherwise, thanks.
Tested-by: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists