lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:52:03 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree

Hi John,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/wireless/libertas/if_sdio.c between commit
886275ce41a9751117367fb387ed171049eb6148 ("param: lock if_sdio's
lbs_helper_name and lbs_fw_name against sysfs changes") from Linus' tree
and commit 3d32a58b87cd251b50842f93b87d5458061c0cfc ("libertas: [sdio]
use common firmware request helper and new firmware locations") from the
wireless tree.

OK, I can't quite figure out what is going on here.  The latter commit
removes that code that was modified by the former, so I effectively
reverted the former commit (by using this file from the wireless tree)
since the "helper" and "firmware" fields of struct if_sdio_card don't
seem to be used anywhere anymore.  Can they be removed as well?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists