netdev - Re: [Patch 1/2] s2io: remove lro parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:54:04 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Jon Mason <jon.mason@...r.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"bhutchings@...arflare.com" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Ramkrishna Vepa <Ramkrishna.Vepa@...r.com>,
	"sgruszka@...hat.com" <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] s2io: remove lro parameter

On 08/18/10 23:36, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:51:09AM -0700, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>
>> As suggested by David, this parameter can die, we can use ethtool
>> to turn LRO on/off. Compile tests only.
>
> Needs some additional removal
>
> Line 41 and 42 " * lro: Specifies whether to enable Large Receive ..."
> As you have removed the modparm
>
> Line 8286 "if (sp->lro)"
> As it will always be on in this instance
>
>
> Also, all references to "sp->lro" can be converted to "(dev->features
> &  NETIF_F_LRO)", removing an unnecessary variable.
>

Thanks for pointing these out.
I will fix them later.

-- 
The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference.
  - Elie Wiesel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html