netdev - Re: [rfc] IPVS: convert scheduler management to RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100820143148.GA2277@verge.net.au>
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:31:52 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] IPVS: convert scheduler management to RCU

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 21:44 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I'm still getting my head around RCU, so review would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > It occurs to me that this code is not performance critical, so
> > > perhaps simply replacing the rwlock with a spinlock would be better?
> > >
> > > Index: nf-next-2.6/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sched.c
> 
> 
> > > -       write_unlock_bh(&__ip_vs_sched_lock);
> > > +       list_del_rcu(&scheduler->n_list);
> > > +       spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_sched_mutex);
> > 
> > Need a rcu_barrier_bh().
> > 
> > >
> > >        /* decrease the module use count */
> > >        ip_vs_use_count_dec();
> 
> 
> Quite frankly, if this is not performance critical, just use the
> spinlock (and dont use 'mutex' in its name ;) )

Will do.

> Using RCU here will force at least one RCU grace period at dismantle
> time...
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html