[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100819.171719.27791197.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: xiaosuo@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] net_sched: cls_flow: use proto_ports_offset() to
support AH message
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:53:09 -0400
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 21:18 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>
>> I had gone through the code before submitting this code. But it isn't
>> easy to test if it breaks sth.
>
> That works well actually and it is the LinuxWay(tm);->
>
>> Would you please give a case to test ?
>
> Just conformance testing. Since you added new AH SPI behavior
> at least find some use case of what people normally use and make sure it
> isnt broken. But if youve looked at code sufficiently i think thats good
> enough.
I agree and I've applied his patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists