[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282587465.2378.10.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:17:45 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: copy_rtnl_link_stats64()
simplification
Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 10:47 -0700, Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:14 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > No need to use a temporary struct rtnl_link_stats64 variable,
> > just copy the source to skb buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>
> Maybe it's better to use the same argument style as copy_rtnl_link_stats
>
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 36 ++++--------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index f78d821..f8781db 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -610,38 +610,10 @@ static void copy_rtnl_link_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats *a,
> a->tx_compressed = b->tx_compressed;
> }
>
> -static void copy_rtnl_link_stats64(void *v, const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *b)
> +static void copy_rtnl_link_stats64(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *a,
> + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *b)
> {
Nope, we have no quarantee of v being aligned on a u64
If you tell compiler first argument is a pointer to rtnl_link_stats64,
it might use 64bit stores and trap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists