[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100824164006.0bd7b7e8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:40:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, public.avatar@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16821] New: g_ether no carrier while it is
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:24:16 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
>
> Summary: g_ether no carrier while it is
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.3(2 - ok, 3?, 4-6 - fail)
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: acme@...stprotocols.net
> ReportedBy: public.avatar@...il.com
> Regression: Yes
>
>
> After successfully loaded g_ether module (with use_eem=0) usb device appears.
> If I configure it at host as ifconfig usb0 blah bah, than network present, all
> ok.
> In windows (with RNDIS config), and in linux with bridge it looks to CARRIER
> state. I get in ip addr state DOWN, NO-CARRIER. That's why g_ether usb device
> in bridge and windows don't work at all.
So g_ether broke after 2.6.32?
Nobody really seems to do much with that USB driver. I wonder if some
changes in core networking could have triggered this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists