netdev - [PATCH] [ROSE] rose node number was never decreased

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:15:01 +0200
From:	Bernard F6BVP <f6bvp@...e.fr>
To:	ralf@...ux-mips.org
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpidoux@...e.fr
Subject: [PATCH] [ROSE] rose node number was never decreased

When a ROSE node was deleted, node number was not
decremented and addr kept going up when a new node
was added.

/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00007 F5KBW-9   ax0      1   0  DTE      no   0   0
00006 F6BVP-11  ax0      2   0  DTE      no   0   0
00005 F6BVP-9   ax0      2   0  DTE      no   0   0
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      0   0  DCE     yes   0   0

With this patch, rose node number is correctly decreased
when nodes are deleted and new ones added :

/proc/net/rose_neigh
addr  callsign  dev  count use mode restart  t0  tf digipeaters
00004 F5KBW-9   ax0      1   0  DTE      no   0   0
00003 F6BVP-11  ax0      2   0  DTE      no   0   0
00002 F6BVP-9   ax0      2   0  DTE      no   0   0
00001 RSLOOP-0  ???      0   0  DCE     yes   0   0

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@...e.fr>




View attachment "rose_route.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (428 bytes)