[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282813434.2476.200.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:03:54 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] gro: __napi_gro_receive() optimizations
Le jeudi 26 août 2010 à 00:51 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:15:11 +0200
>
> > Yes, we can inline it, this will speedup the non vlan case as well :)
>
> Agreed.
>
> But I believe you can find a better place to put __napi_gro_receive()
> than etherdevice.h, even though yes it does have a hard dependency on
> that thing. :-)
>
I tried but failed :(
Or move __napi_gro_receive() in a new header,
because etherdevice.h needs to include netdevice.h
(is_etherdev_addr(), dev_hw_addr_random())
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists