[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100826.131801.246519955.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: brian.haley@...com
Cc: greearb@...delatech.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] ipv6: Enable netlink notification for tentative
addresses.
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:51 -0400
> But then we get a message for an address that can't be used because
> it hasn't passed DAD, I'm not so sure that is a good thing,
> especially if we don't get notified when it passes DAD.
I think that we shouldn't send notifications for an address that can't
even be used. So essentially I argue against this patch in any form :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists