netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] gro: __napi_gro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] gro: __napi_gro_receive() optimizations

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:42:01 -0700

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:38:16PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:35:13 +0200
>> 
>> > +	fold |= *(unsigned long *)(a + 6) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b + 6);
>> 
>> Shouldn't these be "+ 8" instead of "+ 6"?
> 
> I think +6 is right since we're trying to compare 14 bytes worth
> of data.

Indeed, thanks.  I need to borrow some brain cells :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html