netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] bnx2x: Minor link related fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eilong@...adcom.com
Cc:	yaniv.rosner@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] bnx2x: Minor link related fixes

From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:43:42 +0300

> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:45 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> Can you explain why 10mbit/100mbit links have to use forced link mode
>> and do not use autonegotiation by default?  I could understand for
>> 10mbit but 100mbit too?
>> 
> Our understanding of the requirements is that if the user selects force
> speed of 1G or higher, it is recommended to use autonegotiation with
> only that speed advertized. However, when the user selects force speed
> of 10M or 100M, assuming the other side is actually forcing the speed,
> using autonegotiation will fail and fall back to parallel detect and
> that will establish link in HD mode (as required) while the other side
> is likely to be using FD this will cause duplex mismatch and many
> errors, so it is best to keep 10M/100M truly forced to support older
> link partners.

I see, thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html