[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100901.183251.106803238.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: therbert@...gle.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xps-mq: Transmit Packet Steering for multiqueue
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:24:18 -0700
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> 3) Eventually have a user selectable selection (socket option, or system
>> wide, but one sysctl, not many bitmasks ;) ).
>>
> Right, but it would also be nice if a single sysctl could optimally
> set up multiqueue, RSS, RPS, and all my interrupt affinities for me
> ;-)
It's becomming increasingly obvious to me that we need (somewhere,
not necessarily the kernel) a complete datastructure representing
the NUMA, cache, cpu, device hierarchy.
And that can be used to tweak all of this stuff.
The policy should probably be in userspace, we just need to provide
the knobs in the kernel to tweak it however userspace wants.
Userspace should be able to, for example, move a TX queue into a
NUMA domain and have this invoke several side effects:
1) IRQs for that TX queue get rerouted to a cpu in the NUMA
domain.
2) TX queue datastructures in the driver get reallocated using
memory in that NUMA domain.
3) TX hashing is configured to use the set of cpus in the NUMA
domain.
It's alot of tedious work and involves some delicate tasks figuring
out where each of these things go, but really then we'd solve all
of this crap one and for all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists