lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100905072041.GA2928@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 09:20:41 +0200 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> Cc: Christian Riesch <christian.riesch@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > At this point, I think it is clear that, in order to support IEEE > 1588, some kind of changes are needed. I have argued and discussed the Just to be absolutely clear, I should have said, "hardare clocks for IEEE 1588." The aim of the patch set is to support a new kind of hardware. > Having said that, if you are convinced that the existing interfaces > are good enough to support PTP (and possible future methods, as Again, I meant "PTP hardware clocks." When I get some more time, I'll try to put together an executive summary of PTP and of all the discussions that have taken place over the last few months on linux-netdev and the lkml. Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists