netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100905072041.GA2928@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date:	Sun, 5 Sep 2010 09:20:41 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Christian Riesch <christian.riesch@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [RFC] posix clock tuning

On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> At this point, I think it is clear that, in order to support IEEE
> 1588, some kind of changes are needed. I have argued and discussed the

Just to be absolutely clear, I should have said, "hardare clocks for
IEEE 1588." The aim of the patch set is to support a new kind of
hardware.

> Having said that, if you are convinced that the existing interfaces
> are good enough to support PTP (and possible future methods, as

Again, I meant "PTP hardware clocks."

When I get some more time, I'll try to put together an executive
summary of PTP and of all the discussions that have taken place over
the last few months on linux-netdev and the lkml.

Richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html