[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283835729.2585.499.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:02:09 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 19:20 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> Eric, this goes on top of your patch and demonstrates the idea.
>
> Please review if you have a chance:
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 2d1bc76..aeb56af 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,32 @@ static void skb_clone_fraglist(struct sk_buff *skb)
> skb_get(list);
> }
>
> +static struct sk_buff *skb_copy_fraglist(struct sk_buff *parent,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *first_skb = NULL;
> + struct sk_buff *prev_skb = NULL;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> + skb_walk_frags(parent, skb) {
> + struct sk_buff *nskb = pskb_copy(skb, gfp_mask);
> +
> + if (!nskb)
> + goto fail;
> + if (!first_skb)
> + first_skb = skb;
> + else
> + prev_skb->next = skb;
> + prev_skb = skb;
> + }
> +
> + return first_skb;
> +
> +fail:
> + skb_drop_list(&first_skb);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static void skb_release_data(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (!skb->cloned ||
> @@ -812,17 +838,22 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
> fastpath = atomic_read(&skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref) == delta;
> }
>
> - if (fastpath) {
> - kfree(skb->head);
> - } else {
> + if (!fastpath) {
> + if (skb_has_frag_list(skb)) {
> + struct sk_buff *new_list;
> +
> + new_list = skb_copy_fraglist(skb, gfp_mask);
> + if (!new_list)
> + goto free_data;
> + skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = new_list;
Here, skb_shinfo(skb) still points to old shinfo, you should not touch
it. An other user might need it :)
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++)
> get_page(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page);
>
> - if (skb_has_frag_list(skb))
> - skb_clone_fraglist(skb);
> -
> - skb_release_data(skb);
> }
I believe you cannot remove skb_release_data() call, we really need to
perform the atomic operation, and test the result on it, or a double
free could happen.
> +
> + kfree(skb->head);
> +
> off = (data + nhead) - skb->head;
>
> skb->head = data;
> @@ -848,6 +879,8 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
> atomic_set(&skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref, 1);
> return 0;
>
> +free_data:
> + kfree(data);
is it a leftover ?
> nodata:
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
I understand what you want to do, but problem is we need to perform a
CAS2 operation : atomically changes two values (dataref and frag_list)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists